<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.blr.com/hr/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Performance &amp; Termination</title><link>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/13/ShowForum.aspx</link><description>Topics include Attendance, Discipline, Dress Codes, Appraisals, Severance Pay, Termination, more ...</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Re: Layoff</title><link>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/thread/7239.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:41:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a9b4b550-741b-4222-ae48-f5befe32f12c:7239</guid><dc:creator>TXHRGuy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/thread/7239.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=7239</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;As long as your layoffs don't all happen to be foreign born individuals, I think you are OK.&amp;nbsp; Your policy allowing people to take their PL into the negative doesn't mean you have to let people take PL.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Layoff</title><link>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/thread/7233.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:18:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a9b4b550-741b-4222-ae48-f5befe32f12c:7233</guid><dc:creator>HRforME</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/thread/7233.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=7233</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;It does not sound like this falls under &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=98"&gt;FMLA&lt;/a&gt;. Even if it did, as long as you can prove they are part of an overall &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=96"&gt;layoff &lt;/a&gt;and you are not singling them out due to having taken &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=98"&gt;FMLA&lt;/a&gt;, you should be okay.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would make their term date the same as everyone elses unless there is&amp;nbsp;anything in the leave paperwork that guarantees them a job through the return date...anything that makes it more of a contract. You might have an attorney look over the&amp;nbsp;leave paperwork to be sure that it does not.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As to the vacation negative balance, what have you done in the past where employees have terminated and been in the negative?&amp;nbsp;We&amp;nbsp;allow our employees to use time at the beginning of the year but&amp;nbsp;do not ask that it be repaid at &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=169"&gt;termination&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; We have yet to have anyone&amp;nbsp;(since we setup the policy) take advantage.&amp;nbsp; Plus obviously this employee&amp;nbsp;wasn't taking&amp;nbsp;advantage. He/she had no way of knowing&amp;nbsp;that there would be a layoff.&amp;nbsp; And unless he/she is still getting paid and/or due a final paycheck, it will be&amp;nbsp;hard to recover.&amp;nbsp; This is one of the negatives of a policy that allows use before earning.&amp;nbsp; Are you paying severance? Will there be enough to deduct?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Layoff</title><link>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/thread/7232.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:14:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a9b4b550-741b-4222-ae48-f5befe32f12c:7232</guid><dc:creator>1472402</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/thread/7232.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=7232</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.blr.com/hr/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;TXHRGuy:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;Probably fine but there are some possible hangups.&amp;nbsp; Please&amp;nbsp;provide the following information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) How many employees does your company have within a 50 mile radius of the site of the employee who had a scheduled leave?&amp;nbsp; If the employee works remotely, how many employees does your company have within a 50&amp;nbsp; mile radius of the site from&amp;nbsp;where the employee takes direction?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) What state are you in?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) What is the exact wording of your PTO/Vacation/&lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=127"&gt;Personal Leave&lt;/a&gt; policy/policies that may apply here?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4) Is the purpose of the leave known?&amp;nbsp; If so, what is it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1)&amp;nbsp; 65.&amp;nbsp; The employee does not work remotely.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2)&amp;nbsp; Georgia&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3)&amp;nbsp; To summarize, a person at their level can accrue up 15 days of &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=127"&gt;Personal Leave&lt;/a&gt; per year, and can take all of the PL for which they will accrue within a give year at the beginning of the year.&amp;nbsp; Otherwise said, they do not need to accrue the PL before taking it.&amp;nbsp; There is also language that says that any PL taken in excess of that which is accrued on their &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=169"&gt;termination&lt;/a&gt; date is deducted from any pay due to them or &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=154"&gt;severance pay&lt;/a&gt; offered.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4)&amp;nbsp; To visit family in a foreign country.&amp;nbsp; The person is&amp;nbsp;a naturalized citizen.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What we were going to do is send a certified letter today notifying them of the &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=169"&gt;termination&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Layoff</title><link>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/thread/7230.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:02:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a9b4b550-741b-4222-ae48-f5befe32f12c:7230</guid><dc:creator>TXHRGuy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/thread/7230.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=7230</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Probably fine but there are some possible hangups.&amp;nbsp; Please&amp;nbsp;provide the following information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) How many employees does your company have within a 50 mile radius of the site of the employee who had a scheduled leave?&amp;nbsp; If the employee works remotely, how many employees does your company have within a 50&amp;nbsp; mile radius of the site from&amp;nbsp;where the employee takes direction?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) What state are you in?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) What is the exact wording of your PTO/Vacation/&lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=127"&gt;Personal Leave&lt;/a&gt; policy/policies that may apply here?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4) Is the purpose of the leave known?&amp;nbsp; If so, what is it?&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Layoff</title><link>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/thread/7228.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:05:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a9b4b550-741b-4222-ae48-f5befe32f12c:7228</guid><dc:creator>1472402</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/thread/7228.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.blr.com/hr/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=7228</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;My company is a consulting firm that will be going to undergo a &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=96"&gt;layoff &lt;/a&gt;due to the current economic conditions.&amp;nbsp; On the &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=169"&gt;termination&lt;/a&gt; date, one of the people slated for &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=169"&gt;termination&lt;/a&gt; will be on a previously-scheduled &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=127"&gt;personal leave&lt;/a&gt; and will not be returning until a week after the others are terminated.&amp;nbsp; Is it legal to consider their &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=169"&gt;termination&lt;/a&gt; date the same as the others that are affected, or must their &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=169"&gt;termination&lt;/a&gt; date be the date on which they are officially notified of the &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=169"&gt;termination&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The situation is somewhat muddied in that we do not require employees to accrue &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=127"&gt;personal leave&lt;/a&gt; before taking it, and they will be substantially over the amount they would have accrued as of the &lt;a class="BLRAutoLink" target="_blank" href="http://hr.blr.com/topics.aspx?topic=169"&gt;termination&lt;/a&gt; date.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your feedback.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>