Hiring discrimination based on fact that ony social media sources were used?

Last post 02-22-2013, 5:03 PM by TXHRGuy. 2 replies.
Sort Posts:
  •  02-21-2013, 11:58 AM 11078

    editorial is not online. Last active: 10-21-2014, 6:46 PM editorial



    Top 75 Contributor



    Joined on 12-19-2006



    Posts 25



  • Hiring discrimination based on fact that ony social media sources were used?

    Does anyone know a case in which discrimination in hiring is alleged based on fact that only social media sources were used and protected groups are underrepresented?
    missmmc
  •  02-21-2013, 12:44 PM 11079 in reply to 11078

    HRforME is not online. Last active: 05-21-2013, 12:08 PM HRforME



    Top 10 Contributor



    Joined on 10-18-2007



    Posts 505



  • Re: Hiring discrimination based on fact that ony social media sources were used?

    I think the "only" part is where you could get into trouble.  That is limiting your pool and possibly bydisparate impact on one or more protected classes. 

    I don't know of cases, but would suspect that any claim would be under age discrimination under Title VII and ADEA.  This generally states that "Any action that an employer takes that adversely affects a disproportionate number of employees over 40 is also age discrimination."

     The question would then become does posting to social media ONLY adversely affect older applicants? Personally being just over 40 and not in a highly technical job, I would say yes.  However, I am not sure it would be enough to rise to a point of a court case.  I suspect most employers would settle prior to getting to a court case on something like this.  I am not sure there would have been enough time to get to a court case as just now the courts seem to be addressing what rights employers have over employees online presence/account/etc. So I wouldn't wait for a court case to tell me it wasn't the best business/HR practice.

    Another article I found stated "Revised Age Discrimination Regulations: ...Under the new regulation, practices or policies that have a disparate impact on workers who are 40 and over will be considered discriminatory unless based on a "reasonable factor other than age." According to the EEOC, an employment practice will pass muster when it is reasonably designed to achieve a legitimate business purpose in light of the circumstances, including its potential harm to older workers.

    The number of age discrimination claims filed with the EEOC has increased by 50% since 2000. The regulation is a response to concerns that older workers were being unfairly targeted as more employers downsized in recent years. The ADEA applies to all private employers with 20 or more employees, state and local government employers, labor organizations and employment agencies."

     

    One last article can be found at :  blogs.payscale.com/compensation/2011/07/eeoc.html

  •  02-22-2013, 5:03 PM 11088 in reply to 11079

    TXHRGuy is not online. Last active: 05-23-2013, 4:36 PM TXHRGuy



    Top 10 Contributor



    Joined on 11-20-2007



    Posts 1,591



  • Re: Hiring discrimination based on fact that ony social media sources were used?

    I agree with HRforME.  I only want to add that the Title VII claim would be easier to prove.  The standards for proving age discrimination are more difficult because of a difference in the way the two statutes are worded.  Using social media requires access to a digital device.  Digital devices are less available to poor people.  Poor people are predominantly represented by particular groups identifiable by a protected characteristic.

View as RSS news feed in XML
Use of this site constitutes your agreement to the terms and condition specified in the HR.BLR.com Forum Agreement